I have noticed that if I sometimes call their customer care for a particular issue, they will give me another number and ask me to call that other team. Though, it might be something that we just need to get used to." "Some of the graphical user interface changes in the later versions of NetApp have not been as good as the older ones, like in the 9.5 era." "During the initial setup, you need to know what you are doing." "There is room for improvement in terms of support. Oversight is not as good in the new GUI compared to the previous version. If those limitations are increased, it might be helpful." "I don't like the newest GUI. There is a global limitation on the number of Snapshots or clones that can be spun off of a particular Snapshot. That would reduce the physical footprint." "For ONTAP, in general, the deduplication ratio and Snapshot limitation are areas that need improvement. They're always about 40 pounds without the hard drives in them, so it would be great if there's a way to make them smaller yet keep the functionality. Additionally, the cloud features could be more mature." "The size of NetApp could be better. "NetApp AFF could improve SAN storage because it feels as if it was not put together at the beginning, it functions as an afterthought. A filer option so that you could connect the sim or NFS or chips like NetApp does for NAS functionality." "The scalability could be better." The tool’s pricing is high and depends on the partner." "You could argue that it would be preferable if everything were cheaper in order to save taxpayer money." "We would like there to be more enhanced features." "A feature that would be a nice addition to the next release would be a filer option. However, most companies are looking to have more managed solutions which is the opposite direction of what I want." "The solution’s stability could be better. We want more access to the kind of underlying infrastructure of the storage array rather than relying on support. If HPE Nimble Storage could do the same it would be a benefit." "There should be faster interfaces." "I would like to have more administrative rights, for example, root-level administrative rights to the underlying OS of the storage array. We do not need to use some other web browser or something. We can receive everything directly generated from the storage itself. "Pure Storages have some option, which allows us the ability to directly download that host inventory and volume report. That's probably number one in terms of features we appreciate." It provides a very fast response time." "The speed is great. First of all, there is the reliability of things staying online and the small response time as well, from the MetroCluster, for all of the data that we're serving and the applications are talking to the MetroCluster. We mostly use it for our SAP database and we are getting good IO from the hard drive." "It also helps to accelerate databases in our environment. It's mostly for block storage." "The speed of data retrieval is the most valuable feature. We like the scale, and the way NetApp grows, so that's why we use it. It is not impossible, but when you are accustomed to the older version of ONTAP, it just takes a bit getting used to it, but it is about the same as before." "We are a large-scale company, and our growth has been pretty significant over the last five or six years. It expands easily as well." "Technical support has been okay." "The newest version of ONTAP has a bit of a learning curve because you need to learn where things are to find them. It's fast and simple, and provides storage to all of our VMware ESX hosts. We can automate everything for our backups and use cases. "The benefits of being on AFF are the phenomenal speed at which we're able to ingest data and index it, and the IOPS." "Snapshots, snap clones, backups, flexibility, and agility are valuable features.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |